Chapters

Please type your name, a hyphen and the school of thought(s) whose chapters you are writing.

Jaci Evans – Real Business Cycles

Liz Conrad – New Keynesian

Anne LaPerla, Katie Gilchrist – New Classical

Zahra Noor- Monetarists and Austrian school of thought

T.L. Tutor – Phillip’s Curve, Post Keynesian

Scott Drenkard- Phillip’s Curve, Real/Monetary Business Cycle Theory

Elyse Menendez – Monetarism, Post Keynesianism

Sam Waskowicz – Austrian theory

Kristin Tisdelle-New Keynesians

Caitlin Payne-Supply Side

Please submit the chapters you are responsible for no later than next Friday, April 8.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Penultimate Summary of Keynesian Economics

Please read the following and let me know of any questions or suggestions for improvement you have.

An Introduction to John Maynard Keynes and Keynesian Economics

Keynesian economics, developed by John Maynard Keynes, is considered one of the most influential approaches to economic thought. While many economists have changed, altered, and argued Keynes views, Keynesian economics has had a lasting impression on the field. In the wake of the latest recession, Keynesian thought has resurged among prominent economic figures and policy makers. Over seventy years after it’s introduction, Keynesian economics continues to play an important role in how people think about the macro-economy.

John Maynard Keynes was a British economist who became famous in the 1930’s for challenging the views of classical economic thinking in the wake of the Great Depression. He was the son of prominent economist John Neville Keynes and local social reformer Florence Ada Keynes. He grew up in Cambridge, England where his father taught at the university.

Despite his middle class background, Keynes’ intellectual prowess scored him a number of scholarships that allowed him to study at both Eton College, and later King’s College, Cambridge. He was interested in both mathematics and philosophy, which led him eventually to find his true calling in the field of economics.

In 1919, Keynes published “The Economic Consequences of the Peace” in which he predicted the high inflation and economic stagnation in Europe as a result of the reparations imposed on Germany following the First World War. The work also stressed the relationships between various government controls and inflation, and correctly anticipated the rise of Fascism in Europe.

Now considered a prominent economist himself, Keynes became interested in monetary theory. As his studies continued, Keynes became increasingly skeptical of the conclusions of classical economic theory and of the classical dichotomy.  His research in monetary theory convinced him that finance could affect the real side of the economy.  Keynes thus set out to explain the Great Depression using this line of thinking. In 1936, he published The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, concisely known as The General Theory, which arguably became one of the most influential writings of modern economic theory.

The General Theory focuses on refuting the classical conclusions that employment is determined by the price of labor, and proposes that employment is actually determined by spending, or aggregate demand. Keynes argues that under-full employment equilibria exist, unlike the classical claim that if the economy is not at full employment, it will reach full employment eventually. Keynes argues that investment need not equal savings, since investment is a function of the expected rate of return as well as the interest rate.  An increase in saving may lower the interest rate and provide an incentive for investment to rise, but if the expected rate of return is low investment will not rise in proportion to saving.  Consequently, the level of aggregate demand will fall, and the insufficient demand will cause an equilibrium with less than full employment.

Keynes’ “propensity to consume” plays an important role in his theory. Given the propensity to consume and level of employment, Keynes argues an equilibrium exists where aggregate demand equals aggregate supply. Consumption is largely dependent on income, because as income increases, people are willing and able to consume more. Furthermore, increased investment leads to increased income. He introduces the concept of an “expenditure multiplier” to explain this phenomenon. Keynes argues that consumption will always be less than income, but never be negative. Consumption and income will always move in the same direction, and a change in income will create a change in consumption and investment where 1/(1-mpc)= k. An increase in investment results in more income; because of their propensity to consume they will not save all their money. Instead they will spend it, putting part of the increased income back into the economy. In this way a small increase in investment has a larger effect on income. The increased income leads to more consumption, which will raise GDP. Overall, Keynes argues that changes in spending (investment and/or consumption) cause changes in GDP.

Keynes says that the interest rate does not change an individual’s propensity to consume, but rather makes it more expensive for individuals to borrow. The classicals said that interest was created by the supply and demand of saving, but Keynes refuted this saying that interest rates are determined by the supply and demand of money. He argued that savings and investment were much more inelastic than originally hypothesized by the classicals. The interest rate, Keynes says, is determined by people‘s demand, or liquidity preference. It is a measure of the willingness of individuals to part with their liquid assets. Money, he argued, was much more responsive to periods of excessive saving, and would allow faster changes in the interest rate. Because of substitution and income effects on saving, and long-term expectations on investment, the supply and demand of saving, Keynes argued, was not an accurate explanation for how the interest rate adjusts. The interest rate has an obvious effect on the economy because as the interest rate increases, it becomes more expensive to borrow. Individuals will borrow less, resulting in decreased consumption and decreased overall income. As the interest rate rises, Keynes argues that consumer spending and investment will also fall. For these reasons, Keyenes opposed a laissez-faire approach to regulating the macro-economy, and supported federal stimulus in times of massive saving.

Y

The Keynesian view of the world was articulated by Sir John Hicks in the IS-LM model, which became the macroeconomic model used by policy makers for the next few decades. The IS curve represents all equilibria of total spending and total output. The LM curve represents equilibria between interests rates and real income.  In the IS-LM model, investment determines output, and at equilibrium spending is desired or planned. If the government increases its spending the IS curve will shift to the right. This increases GDP as well as interest rates. Keynes believes that increased government spending is good for the economy because it encourages private investment through the accelerator effect.

The accelerator affect says that an increase in GDP leads to an increase in sales. This happens because the more goods that are being produced, more labor is required; people’s income rise and they are able to consume more, further increasing GDP.  An increase in government spending leads to increased output.

The classicals said that increased saving would decrease consumption, but interest rates would also decrease and investment would adjust so that the total aggregate spending would be the same.  Keynes said that spending does affect GDP.  Increased spending leads to increased production, which increases aggregate demand, which affects GDP. He says that people are pessimistic about the future and hold on to their money; as a result it does not flow into financial markets. Because hoarding exists, the interest rate does not affect investment enough to offset consumer saving, therefore aggregate demand can fall and GDP is not always at full potential.

Keynes argues that in order to revert back to full employment the government must use expansionary monetary and fiscal policy in order to stimulate the economy and increase employment, because it won’t happen by the private sector. The government needs to spend money to jumpstart the economy. Keynesian and modern revisions of Keynesian thought continue to influence macro-economic policy today.

Images:

http://www.economicnoise.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/keynesJM.jpg

http://www.biografiasyvidas.com/biografia/k/fotos/keynes.jpg

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Economist Article on Who are the Most Influential Economists after the Great Recession?

http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/02/economics&fsrc=nw

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The 2011 Hamilton Project Policy Innovation Prize

Sam provided this link to the 2011 Hamilton Prize for The Best Proposals to Create Jobs and Enhance Productivity.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Interesting New Website may be relevant for our class!

Check out Qwiki.com .  Type “macroeconomics” into the search box and start following links.  Lots on economists we’ve looked at, but only a little on specific schools of thought.

Still, it’s a novel approach to a web reference.  Check it out and you may find it useful.

Also, please review the readings Kristin linked to at the bottom of the course wiki for Monday’s discussion of the Phillips Curve.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Penultimate Draft

What follows is the penultimate draft of our notes on Classical Economics.  Please read it carefully by Wednesday, and identify anything you don’t understand or any suggestions for improvement.  Leave these as comments below.  Thx!

Classical Macroeconomics

January 12, 2011

While macroeconomics as a discipline may have started with Keynes, he was not the first to think about issues involving the economy as a whole.   Economics usually labels those thinkers classical (or neoclassical) economists.  Classical and neoclassical economists such as Alfred Marshall, Keynes, William Stanley Jevons, Arthur Cecil Pigou, John Bates Clark, Irving Fisher, Knut Wicksell believed in free market efficiency given a series of assumptions known as the First Welfare Theorem. The conditions of this theorem are that there is perfect information in the market, there are zero transaction costs, a large number of buyers and sellers are present, there are no externalities, and all transactions of voluntary.   According to the classical school of thought, free markets functioned better than regulated markets as long as the conditions of the First Welfare Theorem held.

(Neo)classical economists did not differentiate between macroeconomic and microeconomic thought. Classical theory used their understanding of microeconomics to analyze both micro and macroeconomic phenomena. One topic that the classicals did recognize as being economy wide is the presence of business cycles. However, classical tools to analyze business cycles were rather primitive by modern standards. During this time period, macroeconomics did not exist as it is known today, but rather economists aggregated microeconomics to explain macroeconomics. For example, to calculate GDP economists would apply the micro concept of the theory of the firm and add everything up. “Aggregate demand” would be the sum of individual demand curves. The fatal flaw in this way of thinking is that the whole does not necessarily move the same way as the individual.

Neoclassical economists were focused on the supply side of the economy. Specifically, Jean Baptiste Say’s Law dominated (neo)classical economic thought: supply creates its own demand. Say means that production creates income that provides enough purchasing power to purchase all the gods being produced, no more no less. The critical assumption to this theory is that there are no hoarders; all saving is invested so that all income is either spent or invested to assure that it stays in circulation. In this model excess supply in one market must be balanced with excess demand in another; there is no such thing as economy-wide excess supply as stated in Walras’ law. A shift in demand will result in changes in prices; if one good is more desirable it will rise in price, while less desirable goods will fall in price.

The classical view of the economy started with the labor market. The productivity of labor represented the real demand for labor; the economic term for this is the marginal product of labor and it is defined as the wage level divided by the price level. Nominal demand for labor was the marginal revenue product, or the additional revenue gained from one extra unit of labor. This lead to an increased demand for labor as a firm can afford to higher more workers at a lower real wage but lead to a decreased supply of labor because workers would chose not to work at this decreased wage. This leads to an increased nominal wage but at the same quantity of labor.

In classical thought, the labor market also determines employment. At the equilibrium wage rate, everyone who wants a job will get one. Unemployment was believed to be caused by people choosing not to work for low wages. They thought unemployment occurred in one sector of the economy. If there was unemployment in a particular sector, that industry would lower its wages and another sector would increase wages, causing people to move to the higher wage sector and employment to return to equilibrium. Widespread unemployment simply did not occur, according to classical theory, and if it did it was the fault sticky prices due to market imperfections such as unions. Equilibrium employment thus served as the source of aggregate supply, and with the aggregate production function determining aggregate demand, the result was equilibrium output.

When determining the composition of GDP, (neo)classical economists focused on two parameters or behavioral coefficients: thrift and enterprise. Thrift can be thought of as the propensity to save while enterprise can be thought of as the propensity of invest, the availability of investment or the rate of return on capital. Thrift and enterprise are static in the short run and have no effect on the value of GDP, only on the composition of GDP. For example, if there was an autonomous increase in savings, the interest rate decreased and there was a shift in the supply curve. There was no change in demand but there was a change in quantity demanded. Entrepreneurs borrowed the “extra” money. That is, if Y = C + I and C increases, I decreases by the same amount, and Y ultimately stays exactly the same. As another example, assume that there is some technology improvement that causes an increase in enterprise. That increase leads to higher interest rates which lead to increased savings. As a result, consumption decreases and investment increases, while overall output stays the same.

The (neo)classical analysis of the macro-economy led to what is now know as the classical dichotomy. The economy has two sides, real and financial. The financial side includes all nominal factors of the economy and had no effect on the real economy. Demand responded to real factors but aggregate demand could not have any affect on real factors and would be considered passive because it did not influence the level of GDP, just its composition.                         The simple explanation of the classical dichotomy begins with the classical economists viewing macro as aggregated micro. On the supply side, they saw the labor market as the primary determinant of the aggregate production function. This means that changing labor productivity would be the only way to change output. This production function implies a vertical aggregate supply curve based on available resources, with factor prices adjusting so that all resources were employed and output prices adjusting allowing for all goods to be purchased.

The quantity theory of money, based on the equation of exchange MV = PQ, was the classical basis for aggregate demand (AD) MS=MDV=PQ. This equation becomes:

MS=MD=(1/V)PQ        or         MS=MD=kPQ where k=1/V

This means that the demand for money, MD is proportional to the nominal GDP. The demand for money increases when national income increases; the increase in national income means that people are spending more money so they demand more money. Also, if the price level increases the demand for money increases because people must carry more cash to have equivalent purchasing power.

An increase in the money supply shifts aggregate demand right and increases the price level. But this change only affects nominal factors, not any real factors. Because the classical economists assumed that labor was always at full employment, there would be no labor resources that could be devoted increasing output, as indicated by the inelastic aggregate supply curve.

Economists had two main schools of thought regarding the quantity theory of money. The British expanded the definition of money demand to include money for savings purposes. Pigou brought up the wealth effect. The other school of thought was the American school. Irving Fisher did not believe that velocity was constant and thought that velocity is influenced by the interest rate. His beliefs made in a pre-monetarist and an important figure in the development of monetarism. He thought that a change in velocity could have short run real effects. Fisher’s ideas were in direct opposition to accepted ideas of the time.

Classical economists did not conceive of fiscal policy how it is thought of today; government was much more limited and the notion of expansionary fiscal policy—increasing government spending without increasing taxes—would not have been accepted by the voters and was therefore not considered by policy makers. An increase in autonomous investment or consumption would not change aggregate demand because it would be matched by a decrease in the other. Given the equation Y=C+I, it was assumed that all income was put towards either consumption or savings, and that all savings was then put towards investment. Therefore, if income is constant, an increase in consumption must mean a decrease in investment. An increase in net exports would also not change aggregate demand. Because the classical economists believed that in equilibrium they were always operating at full employment there was no “extra” labor to increase productivity to meet the demand for our exports. To meet this demand, labor would be taken out of another sector. Output would change only in composition, not quantity.

If expansionary fiscal policy were enacted, the classical economists believed there would be complete crowding out. In other words, when the government hired workers during the Great Depression private employees would have been fired in response. The only way to change aggregate demand would be monetary policy but the only impact would be on the price level. Therefore, the financial side of the economy is once again unable to affect the real side of the economy as is predicted by the classical dichotomy.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Readings for this Week

Tomorrow we will finish our discussion of the economics of Keynes, and we will likely begin talking about monetarism.  Please read the first item off the monetarist reading list for tomorrow, if you can.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This week’s discussion

Caitlin is going to be leading our discussion of the economics of John Maynard Keynes beginning tomorrow.  This will cover Keynesian thought through the early 1970s.  We’ll explore New Keynesian thinking later in the semester.  Caitlin has asked that we read the second chapter in the readings book, Alan Coddington’s article.  You can get this on Googlebooks here.  Just scroll down to p. 36 and start reading.  I’ve noted a few other readings you might look at on this page.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

To Read

To help you decide which topic from the course outline you’d like to lead, you should read the lead article in the Snowdon & Vane reader, which you can get via googlebooks.  I expect Caitlin will ask you to read something else prior to beginning our discussion of Keynes and Keynesian economics on Wednesday.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More Tasks

  1. Login to the course wiki at http://stevegreenlaw.org/profgwiki/index.php/ECON488
  2. Enter the url for your blog on the course wiki
  3. Explore wikipedia.org for something relevant to our course.  Post a link to one or more relevant wikipedia article on our wiki.  Try to research the various topics on our course outline, one of which you’ll need to lead the group in class discussion.
  4. Who wants to take class notes for our discussion of (Neo)Classical Economics beginning today?  We need two volunteers.
  5. Who wants to lead the discussion of Keynes & Keynesian Economics starting next Wednesday?
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment